Aside from three or four of these where I know personally that they meet the standard, I've been taking everyone's word on things. If that isn't spreading unverified information, then I don't know what is. I am trying to be overly cautious so that no one gets misled by something on the list, but if I end up making a mistake, I prefer to err on the side of caution. I am trying my best to post a good list, but EVERYONE that cares about this needs to help. You will see that I posted GForce's response. It's verified now that it fits the original criteria. However, if I were to wait until each and every developer responded to a query, then there would never be a list--this has to be a team effort.@audiojunkie
I almost got a heart attack when reading that GForce is calling home.
Please don't spread unverified information. You're interpreting texts found on developers websites as facts. It's illogical to come to the conclusion that something must be calling home because there is a parallel activation limit. Such a limit can be defined regardless of the type of copy protection.
Otherwise i think it is always a good idea to have such a list at hand. The list just should be correct and updated regularly.
Do you have any plugins from companies that are not on the list that require only a serial or keyfile and meet the criteria on the first page? It would be great if you have some! Statistics: Posted by audiojunkie — Wed Aug 07, 2024 4:29 pm