Its been years so I decided to give it a second look even though there is the ridiculous 40min time limit restriction.If you've tried an earlier Mulab version before but it didn't click I suggest you give it a second look.
The way I see it is it's a damn modular daw, and there's a 40 minute restriction??? It takes me that long just to get to know an unfamiliar DAW.
I really don't get why the demo cant be fully functional with the option to save and a license to open the saved files.
Whatever. Gave it another go anyways.
Mulab suffers from what I call the One Man Syndrome in reference to the layout and workflow. It's made from one man's point of view. With that being said, either you "get it" or you don't. Unfortunately I don't so no, it's not fun. The whole overall workflow feels "unfinished" (that's the best description i can give).It really is a lot of fun to work with.
What's with the dual modular parts? So you have the main modular layout for the whole project and then the modular part which is the Mux??? I have no idea.
Mulab would be better if it was just one main modular area where you can load customized layouts.
So, ditch the whole composer layout and just have it where you can load as many tracks one wants and sync it to a transport device/module.
Even better have each track with it's own exclusive transport settings (its own BPM, time sig, length play/stop/playback settings etc.).
If one wants they can "slave" tracks to follow one master track and voila there's your "composer".
You could even extend this to work like a looping matrix.
Add this to building a modular synth and it would be a solid modular DAW.
Right now it's a too disorganized (imo) layout for something that could be an open canvas modular host (and the possibility ro be a good one at that).
Basically pick up where Bidule left off.
Statistics: Posted by VOODOO U — Mon Jan 15, 2024 4:45 am