I posted a link from the Plugdata thread to my comment about it, vis-a-vis Sumu, here.i already work with such a, well how should one call it, i am the only one who works with it, and it will be at some point released, it is module for a soft modular.'Reverse Engineering' Sumu?
Could Sumu be somehow duplicated, echoed or improved in Plugdata? Probably. Maybe get 64 'sinebanks' ('sinebank abstraction/module') and patch them up with various kinds of 'blocks/abstractions/modules'? What do you think? Anyone up to it? Maybe 16 (and less [finer resolution], user-defined, depending on CPU) 'sine banks' of 2048 (or more, user-defined, depending on CPU)? How hard/easy could it be? Free, if for a suggested $149 donation (--price-match-- whatever Sumu's going for)... if one is motivated by such things.
I mean, what are most if not all instruments we use hereon but rips or remixes of what came before and/or what is, maybe in large part by student/taxpayer-funded university research?
The results could of course be fed back into Sumu, and locked back in, for a price.
64 partials, with per partial FM/PM/AM, and ADSR, so you can FM a partial with another partial, or from another module. is a great thing. but still not ready, because the developer and i are lazy.
and Music Developments Syne is there, to tickle your partials....
it is already there, Reaktor Ensembles, with 1024 partials etc.
I am aware of MD's Syne, but is it, and yours, FLOSS (Free/Libre/Open Source)?
Syne's $50 and doesn't appear FLOSS either-- neither Reaktor. The point about my mention of Plugdata is that it is FLOSS, and fits in a DAW.
Have you looked at Plugdata for your synth? Is that where you're developing it? If so, and if you're lazy as you say, would you consider outsourcing some of its development?
Statistics: Posted by Sackbut — Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:04 pm